3 ms·
Actual meta-analyses and systematic replication are so rare as to basically not matter. In addition, many actual scientists are completely unaware of these fund
by cultus 8y ago
Actual meta-analyses and systematic replication are so rare as to basically not matter. In addition, many actual scientists are completely unaware of these fundamental issues in science. Not to mention scientist's statistical misconceptions. The vast, vast majority (over 90% from surveys I've seen) commit the inverse-probability fallacy, for example.