7 ms·
I didn't look at the raw data, but no awk in the top 50?
by zantana 8y ago
I didn't look at the raw data, but no awk in the top 50?
- todpole3 8y agoIt was mentioned in the paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08979 https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08979): commands that correspond to non-Bash language interpreters were filtered out from the dataset and `awk` and `sed` were filtered out because they are the interpreters of string processing languages.