4 ms·
You don't have to assume that poor people are lazy in order to be worried about how the money will be spent. It takes an equally shaky assumption in order to be
by tenaciousDaniel 8y ago
You don't have to assume that poor people are lazy in order to be worried about how the money will be spent. It takes an equally shaky assumption in order to believe that the money will be spent as intended. I'd have to see a wealth of evidence to convince me of that.
- dragonwriter 8y ago> You don't have to assume that poor people are lazy in order to be worried about how the money will be spent. It takes an equally shaky assumption in order to believe that the money will be spent as intended. The intent of most UBI supporters is that money be spent according to the perceived needs of the recipients. Centralized control of use is an explicit non-goal. In fact, one big argument of UBI supporters is that aid recieved even in restricted form will often be redirected in that manner with overhead for the mechanisms of repurposing the benedits, in any case, such that attempts to control how aid is spent are often just expending extra public resources in administrative functions with the net effect of reducing the value of benefits without controlling their use.
- Frondo 8y ago"as intended" -- intended by whom, and for what purpose? It's their money, not yours, not mine, and they can do whatever they please with it. Let people be people, the world has more than enough to take care of everyone even when they're doing whatever they want.