4 ms·
Agreed, digital typography was far more constrained back in the day. You couldn't even embed a ttf font into a web page until recently, and the intersection of
by blt 8y ago
Agreed, digital typography was far more constrained back in the day. You couldn't even embed a ttf font into a web page until recently, and the intersection of Mac and Windows default fonts was like 4 fonts. Even in images, the low dpi made it impossible to use fonts with fine details.
There was some interesting article a few years back. It stated that web design had come to rely more on snazzy layouts and images to compensate for ugly type, whereas print design often is fairly minimal and lets the letterforms dominate. Now those constraints are lifted, the article argued that web designers should adopt a more typography-centric style.
- Theodores 8y ago> Now those constraints are lifted, the article argued that web designers should adopt a more typography-centric style. Constraints might be lifted but web fonts are downloaded on a per page/site basis. If that font has fifty languages and many unicodes then it is bloat or with characters falling back to a system font. Given that some fonts haven't changed since 1066 then it seems a bit silly to check with the server on a per page basis if the fonts have been a) licensed and b) updated lately. A benevolent dictator is needed, e.g. the E.U., to mandate some means of insisting that a good selection of fonts are baked into every device for citizens to be able to read government published stuff in order to solve this. Or maybe the holy blockchain could solve it so that font creators get paid properly for font usage. (I jest about being able to pay font foundries with this alternative licensing model).