4 ms·
The level of wealth we have is disproportionately assigned to the minority of people best able to exploit the majority of people. Obviously we can go back and f
by rainonmoon 8y ago
The level of wealth we have is disproportionately assigned to the minority of people best able to exploit the majority of people. Obviously we can go back and forth on the specifics of how the world's current state of prosperity has benefits and harms, but to present that level of wealth as intrinsically beneficial is disingenuous.
- refurb 8y agoYou didn’t address my point at all. You claimed that “cost efficies” are a negative about capitalism and I said that’s the reason why level of wealth has changed increased dramatically even for the lowest rung. Just because it’s disproportionate doesn’t mean my statement isn’t true.
- rco8786 8y agoYour points are not mutually exclusive. The efficiencies are a large part of the reason we’ve collectively grown our wealth. They also are at times not the most advantageous to our society.