4 ms·
You've been lied to. Count the party switchers in that time period: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Representatives_who_switched_parties ht
by burfog 8y ago
You've been lied to. Count the party switchers in that time period:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Representatives_who_switched_parties https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Represen...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Senators_who_switched_parties https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Senators...
It's just 2, Strom Thurmond in the senate and Albert Watson in the house. If the "party switch" narrative were correct, you'd expect many more. What is going on here is that nobody wants to own the history of the KKK or voting against civil rights legislation because that is an unelectable position to take in modern America. An effective way to evade this ugly history is to throw it at the opposing party, falsely claiming the illogical idea that the parties just decided to swap sides one day.
- scarface74 8y agoNot the politicians - the electorate. If you think voting against civil rights makes a politician “unelectable” in the South....you haven’t lived in the South.
- burfog 8y agoLet's see how that holds up: Prior to the supposed switch, democrat politicians voted against civil rights laws and even filibustered them. They were also KKK. Republican politicians were trying to pass civil rights legislation. The electorate for democrats presumably liked democrats (else why vote that way?) and the same for the electorate for republicans. So you say it wasn't the politicians that switched, but the electorate. OK, so now people on both sides suddenly change their views... say what? That would be like a 2020 election with all the Hillary voters choosing Trump and all of Trump's original supporters picking Robert Mueller. Want to make it that the politicians switch views but stay in their party, while the voters switch views and/or party affiliation? Aw, come on... this is completely implausible. Suddenly the republican politicians all become racist, and suddenly the democrat politicians all decide they like civil rights? What could possibly make that unproven event happen, and why would only 2 members of congress resist going along with it? None of that is believable at all. This whole thing is just marketing. I have in fact lived in the South, and anybody running for congress WILL LOSE if they take a position against civil rights. When your political party has a history seeped in this unelectable position, you'll do anything to evade it, including dishonestly claiming the other party somehow inherited your past.