3 ms·
I'm sorry that my general frustration with most of the comments in this thread materialised as being directed toward you specifically. That wasn't my intention.
by yakshaving_jgt 8y ago
I'm sorry that my general frustration with most of the comments in this thread materialised as being directed toward you specifically. That wasn't my intention.
People (not necessarily you or I) are going to be annoyed though. And this is fine. A tool doesn't need to be the most popular alternative to "thrive" or to "win" (quoting some other commenter now).
The thought process for most people in this thread seems to be:
1. Get mad when their "freedoms" (dangerous synchronous FFI) are taken away.
2. Complain, because the programmer knows best (ego/hubris).
3. Complain further about "the community" when their egos aren't pandered to.
If the maintainers relinquished their ideals, we'd have a language as dangerous as most of the alternatives. Frankly, I'm not interested in a "community" where everyone gets along but the software is always broken. I need my stuff to work.
To you, specifically, I appreciate that you tried to keep the discussion amicable. Thank you for that, and again I'm sorry.
- jlengrand 8y agoNo big worries. Insults fly a lot on HN, this won't be the last time. Agreed. It's not about pleasing people. Being opiniated is what brought Elm where it is. And it is not about winning. Definitely agree there too. I just wish design considerations were communicated in a more positive, rather than autoritative manner. Because it makes people lose motivation and brings negativity.
- jlengrand 8y agoBTW, I appreciate you apologizing. It takes balls and lots of people just don't like it. Much appreciated, sending you virtual karma kudos :)