107 ms·

Very interesting ideas in there. Especially the thought of an upcoming Go 2 perhaps being done in such a compatible way that "Go 2" is actually "Go 1.1X" He al

by howeyc 8y ago

Very interesting ideas in there. Especially the thought of an upcoming Go 2 perhaps being done in such a compatible way that "Go 2" is actually "Go 1.1X" He also hints that it would likely only be done to address major issues/concerns/changes such as: * generics * modules (perhaps done? time will tell) * errors (if err != nil {}, extra type information, chaining, etc) * context Still to early to tell if anything I listed or he listed would be part of "Go 2" or whatever it happens to be called.

sitepodmatt 8y ago
Don't use the word generics with golang exapple fanboys, just open a world of hate, what's wrong with StringSet.go, IntSet.go and so on (k8s), or fulfilling interface {} as a workaround. Cue hate, give me c# 1.1 anyday
- whatpad 8y ago
  Are you referring to: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/vendor/github.com/heketi/heketi/pkg/utils/stringset.go https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/vendor/... https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/plugin/pkg/auth/authorizer/node/intset.go https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/plugin/...
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
- endorphone 8y ago
  The person you replied to is quoting the slides that posit that generics are a consideration for Go 2.0, so your spittle laden post betrays your own bizarre hangups. "Cue hate, give me c# 1.1 anyday" You brought the hate. Take it when you leave. Thanks.
mseepgood 8y ago
> Very interesting ideas in there. Especially the thought of an upcoming Go 2 perhaps being done in such a compatible way that "Go 2" is actually "Go 1.1X" Go project lead Russ Cox already talked about that on an episode of the Go Time podcast. Transcript: https://changelog.com/gotime/77#transcript-60 https://changelog.com/gotime/77#transcript-60
fredch 8y ago
Don't people just write helper functions to deal with the error checking spam? It's five lines at the top of the file... Anyway, I will miss our GOPATH overlords. I have enough decisions to make, I'm fine with the language making some for me.

by howeyc 8y ago

sitepodmatt 8y ago

Don't use the word generics with golang exapple fanboys, just open a world of hate, what's wrong with StringSet.go, IntSet.go and so on (k8s), or fulfilling interface {} as a workaround. Cue hate, give me c# 1.1 anyday

whatpad 8y ago
Are you referring to: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/vendor/github.com/heketi/heketi/pkg/utils/stringset.go https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/vendor/... https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/plugin/pkg/auth/authorizer/node/intset.go https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/plugin/...
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
endorphone 8y ago
The person you replied to is quoting the slides that posit that generics are a consideration for Go 2.0, so your spittle laden post betrays your own bizarre hangups. "Cue hate, give me c# 1.1 anyday" You brought the hate. Take it when you leave. Thanks.

mseepgood 8y ago

> Very interesting ideas in there. Especially the thought of an upcoming Go 2 perhaps being done in such a compatible way that "Go 2" is actually "Go 1.1X" Go project lead Russ Cox already talked about that on an episode of the Go Time podcast. Transcript: https://changelog.com/gotime/77#transcript-60 https://changelog.com/gotime/77#transcript-60

fredch 8y ago

Don't people just write helper functions to deal with the error checking spam? It's five lines at the top of the file... Anyway, I will miss our GOPATH overlords. I have enough decisions to make, I'm fine with the language making some for me.