4 ms·
Having worked several years on critical embedded systems in aerospace, I would tend to agree with you. But on the other hand, has any Tesla car ever had an acc
by crubier 8y ago
Having worked several years on critical embedded systems in aerospace, I would tend to agree with you.
But on the other hand, has any Tesla car ever had an accident because of this? At some point, "heavily tested and validated end to end in real-life conditions for years" and "formally proven on a simplified model using reasonable assumptions made by human engineers" become relatively close in terms of how much trust you can put in a system.
But somehow we tend to prefer to later. I am not sure if this paradigm is still relevant these days.
- xg15 8y ago> "heavily tested and validated end to end in real-life conditions for years" That seems like a more wordy way to state "It's been fine so far". > "formally proven on a simplified model using reasonable assumptions made by human engineers" I didn't know about that. What kind of formal proofs did they do? Did they involve the linux scheduler?