> the answer should be instead to privatize all the schools. Do you mean "privatize" in the honest sense that would leave many people with no school at all, or

> the answer should be instead to privatize all the schools. Do you mean "privatize" in the honest sense that would leave many people with no school at all, or in the other sense that would privatize only the profits while the funding still comes from taxpayer dollars? Usually when I hear about "privatizing" schools people mean the latter, with a side effect of shedding regulation and liability as well. > Most private schools have lower per pupil spending that government run schools. Citation needed, particularly a citation that accounts for factors like cherry-picking students, relying on a large private endowment from a more exclusive era, or failing to meet various standards - e.g. certification, curriculum, health and safety - that are applied to public schools.