You mean, besides the employers just laying off workers who they can't afford because they've now become significantly more expensive? The workers wouldn't be b

You mean, besides the employers just laying off workers who they can't afford because they've now become significantly more expensive? The workers wouldn't be better off, and would be more of a tax burden than before. This isn't reducing government waste, it's just another tax to "solve" a problem the government created via the welfare gap.