>Both of these are objectively good things that increase consumer confidence, public safety, etc. I haven't seen any indication that these are "objectively goo

>Both of these are objectively good things that increase consumer confidence, public safety, etc. I haven't seen any indication that these are "objectively good things" that increase any of these public goods. >>Drug use is a choice and in most jurisdictions, and federally in the US, is a crime. That doesn't make drug users not marginalized. >>but that doesn't mean it isn't the business owner's right to do so if they disagree. Of course, I didn't suggest otherwise. >>Which is probably another good thing considering you can barely feed yourself if you work for minimum wage. Their alternative is working informally (e.g. bottle collection) and making below minimum wage without the benefit of gaining marketable skills, or not working, and making nothing, so I can't see how it could possibly be a good thing.