3 ms·
Right, I get your previous comment now. I would agree with it if it where: "Democracy generally means I am being governed according to some, but not all of my
by bopbop 8y ago
Right, I get your previous comment now. I would agree with it if it where:
"Democracy generally means I am being governed according to some, but not all of my wishes."
The fact that you are/are not being governed according to some of your wishes in a non-democratic society is coincidental. Why it may or may not be true for any given government, it is not inherent to the structure of any non-democratic government.
For all of the subsequent points in this comment about compromise, that's desirability in a democratic (small d) candidate - that doesn't have anything to do with the system itself.
But yes, I appreciate all the points you are making about the candidates - I would say Bernie does compromise, but his stubbornness is part of his desirability, certainly.
Hilarys ability to compromise becomes extremely clear when you look at what she stood for in the 70s/80s and the policies she pushed while running for presidency.
Thanks for clarifying, that was interesting.
- beat 8y agoYeah, I think underneath it all, one of my points is that whether or not I'm being governed according to my wishes isn't really a function of democracy. A lot of people live in authoritarian societies where they quite agree with the main thrust of the government. As an aside on the Hillary thing... something that frustrates me as a Democrat is that we're supposed to be the party of learning and evolving, but then we punish people for opinions held and mistakes made decades ago. I want our candidates to evolve. I've certainly evolved.