4 ms·
Woah.. spoilers ahead The author discusses her lack of guanxi and her decision to major in literature as a detriment to her career path ... in the new york ti
by eb48 8y ago
Woah..
spoilers ahead
The author discusses her lack of guanxi and her decision to major in literature as a detriment to her career path ... in the new york times. The postmodernism is striking!
- netsharc 8y agoDetriment to her career path? Did you read the right article? More like her lack of networking deterred her from getting the benefits of knowing people, benefits her peers can enjoy.
- eb48 8y agoNo, you should re-read the article. She states that if she lacks networking, then she'd need to get by with wealth -- which then she follows up in a significant part of the article with why she doesn't have wealth due to taking up a less privileged career path.
- netsharc 8y agoYou're mixing success in career with success in life (wealth/status). She's doing fine in her career path, right? If I want to be an accomplished historian of e.g. Tibetan architecture, I can know everything in that field, but it's probably not going to pay well because society doesn't care. Then again, googling what "career success" means, the results say it's a personal definition, so maybe we're both wrong.