3 ms·
I'm a bit surprised that no attempt was mentioned to determine which direction its coming from? A beam, 16 miles wide.. of course its trite, but could be exhau
by clort 8y ago
I'm a bit surprised that no attempt was mentioned to determine which direction its coming from?
A beam, 16 miles wide.. of course its trite, but could be exhaust from starships decelerating into the solar system, or residue from a solar flare perhaps?
- creddit 8y agoIt's probably exhaust from starships.
- Toenex 8y ago"I just don't get it Mork, why don't the earthlings reply? Our messages couldn't be clearer."
- mrhappyunhappy 8y ago“We’ve been zipping by for years!” “Forget it! They just don’t want to be friends!”
- cm75 8y agoIn the article, there is a link to a timelapse video on vimeo [0]. The "Steve" phenomenon seems to extend on an east-west axis, assuming that the "normal" aurora borealis in the video is to the north. Two days before (May 06, 2016) there was a geostationary satellite launch by SpaceX from Cape Canaveral (JCSAT-14 / JCSAT-2B, positioned now on 154°East) [1]. Could it be possible that "Steve" is just residual exhaust gas from the recent satellite launch which may behave similar to an actual aurora phenomenon when ionized? [0] https://vimeo.com/166121341 https://vimeo.com/166121341 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_in_spaceflight#May https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_in_spaceflight#May