> better than nothing, [which is sometimes the only other option] True. The trick is to sort of mentally keep track of how much better than nothing it is, so

> better than nothing, [which is sometimes the only other option] True. The trick is to sort of mentally keep track of how much better than nothing it is, so you know which pieces of anecdotal evidence you can trust with only 40% confidence, and which you can trust with something more like 90%. But yeah, definitely WAY better than nothing.