You need to keep up with the denialism cutting edge, they’ve given up on attacking the incontrovertible science, and are pivoting to defeatism, “global greening

You need to keep up with the denialism cutting edge, they’ve given up on attacking the incontrovertible science, and are pivoting to defeatism, “global greening” and other versions of “it’s happening, so what?” Get with the times man!... And That website is bizarre! A bit of climate denialism, a dash of pro-lifer, and just a soupson of islamophobia. Charming. To be charitable though, I don’t necessarily blame people for looking at the magnitude of the problem and deciding to go deeply into denial. With the dearth of hope and workable solutions, pretending that there is no problem and attacking old numbers probably feels better than the alternatives. What I can’t forgive or stand though, are people who deny because the solutions are politically unpalatable to them. A better read than “American Thinker” would be https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/nov/29/new-study-uncovers-the-keystone-domino-strategy-of-climate-denial https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change (Especially the many and varied citations) https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ https://www.csicop.org/si/show/the_consensus_on_anthropogenic_global_warming https://www.csicop.org/si/show/the_consensus_on_anthropogeni...