3 ms·
I think I've explained myself quite well in the thread. My personal, subjective conclusion is of dishonesty. I cannot give you an objective measure, the evidenc
by Sir_Cmpwn 8y ago
I think I've explained myself quite well in the thread. My personal, subjective conclusion is of dishonesty. I cannot give you an objective measure, the evidence is in this thread and you can draw your own conclusions. Being a generally good person who is trying to put food on the table for their family is not mutually exclusive with lying and resorting to questionably ethical means of doing so.
- sanderjd 8y agoI've (unfortunately) read the whole thread. You've jumped to an uncharitable conclusion. A bunch of people have pointed this out. You can disagree while assuming good faith. It's too bad you aren't doing that here. I agree with you that it isn't a very good choice for licensing terms.
- Sir_Cmpwn 8y ago>You can disagree while assuming good faith Yes, but bad faith exists, and the assumption of good faith is not always appropriate. I don't think that Dgraph is operating in good faith, and the evidence is enough that I am unable to suspend my disbelief. If I were Dgraph and my actions were so severely wrong that people were assuming bad faith, I would want to quickly correct that. But in fact, most of the concerns have gone un-answered.