8 ms·
The paper (https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/population_and_sustainability/pdfs/OSUCarbonStudy.pdf https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/popul
by thatfrenchguy 8y ago
The paper (https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/population_and_sustainability/pdfs/OSUCarbonStudy.pdf https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/population_and_...
) cited by the paper (http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541/meta http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541/m...) cited by the article says an interestingly different story:
lifetime emissions of CO2 that are saved by different actions (US)
Increase car’s fuel economy from 20 to 30 mpg 148
Reduce miles driven from 231 to 155 per week 147
Reduce number of children by one:
Constant-emission scenario 9,441
Optimistic scenario 562
Pessimistic scenario 12,730
So basically fighting climate change, or having kids who consume less, has a much greater impact.