3 ms·
I think what you're insinuating is a side effect of the OpenBSD group being open, honest, and congruent to their ethics.
by swixmix 8y ago
I think what you're insinuating is a side effect of the OpenBSD group being open, honest, and congruent to their ethics.
- DannyBee 8y agoWhat he's insinuating is that they agreed to embargos and then repeatedly broke them, claiming it was "better for users". Regardless of whether it is, you should expect the result of that to be that nobody trusts them with embargoes. Which is in fact, what has happened.
- swixmix 8y agoThe KRACK embargo expired as per agreement but I'll partially concede after reading about this OpenSSL accident: https://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/regarding-embargoes https://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/regarding-embargoes Google broke an embargo early. https://security.googleblog.com/2018/01/todays-cpu-vulnerability-what-you-need.html https://security.googleblog.com/2018/01/todays-cpu-vulnerabi... EFail embargo was broken. See https://twitter.com/seecurity/status/995964977461776385 https://twitter.com/seecurity/status/995964977461776385 and http://flaked.sockpuppet.org/2018/05/16/a-unified-timeline.html http://flaked.sockpuppet.org/2018/05/16/a-unified-timeline.h... I don't think picking on OpenBSD is the right thing here.