>How do you know that the takedown was due to the content being anti-something? I’m genuinely asking. https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2018/08/susp

>How do you know that the takedown was due to the content being anti-something? I’m genuinely asking. https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2018/08/suspected-iranian-influence-operation.html https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2018/08/suspect... >This operation is leveraging a network of inauthentic news sites and clusters of associated accounts across multiple social media platforms to promote political narratives in line with Iranian interests. These narratives include anti-Saudi, anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian themes, as well as support for specific U.S. policies favorable to Iran, such as the U.S.-Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). It seems the word 'inauthentic' is being used as an alternative to 'dissenting'.