3 ms·
How do you know that the takedown was due to the content being anti-something? I’m genuinely asking. There is an endless supply of deeply offensive content on
by maltalex 8y ago
How do you know that the takedown was due to the content being anti-something? I’m genuinely asking.
There is an endless supply of deeply offensive content on fb that’s not taken down. Including anti-Israel/Pro-Palestine.
If you believe the official announcement, this content was taken down not because some people disagree with it, but because it’s “inauthentic”.
- prolikewh0a 8y ago>How do you know that the takedown was due to the content being anti-something? I’m genuinely asking. https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2018/08/suspected-iranian-influence-operation.html https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2018/08/suspect... >This operation is leveraging a network of inauthentic news sites and clusters of associated accounts across multiple social media platforms to promote political narratives in line with Iranian interests. These narratives include anti-Saudi, anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian themes, as well as support for specific U.S. policies favorable to Iran, such as the U.S.-Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). It seems the word 'inauthentic' is being used as an alternative to 'dissenting'.