2 ms·
> They likely weren't very "intelligent" in recent years. They were intelligent enough to convince a non-trivial number of voters.
by craftyguy 8y ago
> They likely weren't very "intelligent" in recent years.
They were intelligent enough to convince a non-trivial number of voters.
- jlarocco 8y agoSerious question: is there evidence to support that claim? We know there was "meddling", but has it been proved that it convinced a "non-trivial" number of voters to change their vote or that it actually affected the outcome of the election?
- smt88 8y agoI think you misunderstood what I meant. By "intelligent", I was referring to the level of sophistication of the automation used to manipulate voters. It seems not to have made extensive use of conversational AIs or NLP.