> which would be probably less than 1% as numerous as the "Many computer users" that run javascript. So? Many does not mean most. There's a choice to be made

> which would be probably less than 1% as numerous as the "Many computer users" that run javascript. So? Many does not mean most. There's a choice to be made, apply the security patch and accept the performance loss, or don't. Some people may not need to to remain close to as safe as they were previously based on their configuration for some of their systems, and I would guess the number of systems easily numbers in the millions. This is a benefit for those people, and worth mentioning, even if it's not nearly a large a number as the total number of CPUs or customers.