4 ms·
I’ve taken this course and it’s excellent, all three parts. It makes me wish there were a modern standard ML, without laziness, typeclasses or Object Oriented-
by danabrams 8y ago
I’ve taken this course and it’s excellent, all three parts.
It makes me wish there were a modern standard ML, without laziness, typeclasses or Object Oriented-ness.
- nerdponx 8y agoNot knowing any ML myself, what is it about ML that you want to retain?
- sofetch 8y agoI guess the https://mythryl.org/ https://mythryl.org/ dream died with its creator.
- davidivadavid 8y agoWell, isn't that just Standard ML?
- Yoric 8y agoWell, given that OCaml almost doesn't use it's optional Object Oriented-ness, that might be what you're looking for.
- jcelerier 8y ago> Well, given that OCaml almost doesn't use it's optional Object Oriented-ness, that might be what you're looking for. so... you use OCaml without modules ?
- simplify 8y agoTry looking at https://people.mpi-sws.org/~rossberg/1ml/ https://people.mpi-sws.org/~rossberg/1ml/
- sanderjd 8y agoWould a non-OO style of OCaml be what you want, or if not, what is it missing?
- sacado2 8y agowould Elm do the trick?