5 ms·
Nobody is wishing death. People just want pure truth, not sugar coating like this headline implies. The biodiversity has been lost, rainforest lost. One tree c
by birksherty 8y ago
Nobody is wishing death. People just want pure truth, not sugar coating like this headline implies.
The biodiversity has been lost, rainforest lost. One tree contains a whole environment. Various insects, birds, animals depend on it. So all of that is lost when the tree is cut.
Now some people planted industrial timber plantations, because of money. None of that is same as what was before. The trees that are planted are not even the same type.
Suppose a bank takes away a family's home with all objects in it. After that the bank gives them a plastic chair. There is some positivity in it because they gained one chair. People are asking why they are not happy about the chair. Why they bring the home into discussion every time we talk about the chair? They probably just want to hear sad things and hate the good news.
- marcus_holmes 8y agobut that's not the situation. Biodiversity loss is measured in loss of habitat. More trees = more habitat.
- 3x 8y agoBiodiversity loss would be measured in loss of biodiversity, I would think.
- marcus_holmes 8y agoyeah you'd think so. But that's not how it works. Ecologists estimate species loss by habitat loss. If a million-hectare forest contains a thousand species, and half of it is cut down, then 500 species are assumed to be lost.
- monkeybutt 8y agoWhat? They are planting "genetic deserts" of hundreds of acres ofof industrial trees. Biodiversity is lost, habitat is lost because these are not the age, type and woodland mix of plants that made an aan actual habitat. Rows as far as the eye can see of lumber pine trees are no more of a proper habitat than mile after mile of cotton or rice or almonds in the CA central valleyvalley are a reasonable replacement for the habitat and biodiversity that was there previously, not to mention the critical loss of micro wetlands.