4 ms·
The big issue here is: Who does our browser work for? People worry that self-driving cars will take us to "promoted" coffee, if we're not specific. More genera
by Syzygies 8y ago
The big issue here is: Who does our browser work for?
People worry that self-driving cars will take us to "promoted" coffee, if we're not specific. More generally, software agents as a rule are loyal to their creators, not to us. That we put up with this is absurd.
Browsers should be intelligent agents that are entirely loyal to the person browsing. For example, no site should be able to tell whether we see ads or not. As one site-by-site option, process the ads exactly as if they're reaching our senses, but don't actually render them so they reach our senses.
Not even having a back button loyal to us? That's obscene. Copyright infringement is the MacGuffin in this movie; the real story is that we're wusses for having totally lost this balance of power struggle in our personal software.
- prepend 8y agoOSS is our best bet because the users can be the creators. Firefox is a mixed bag on this. What I want is like the equivalent of fiduciary duty [0] but for AI and software. This is why I don’t like the idea of “free” agents driven by ad revenue. Currently I have to manually review and build my own stuff. Not sustainable. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiduciary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiduciary