3 ms·
There is nothing passive-aggressive in intel-microcode-legally-restricted, it's just a statement of fact.
by dvfjsdhgfv 8y ago
There is nothing passive-aggressive in intel-microcode-legally-restricted, it's just a statement of fact.
- mpartel 8y agoIt's not quite that clear cut IMO. E.g. "intel-microcode-legacy" and "intel-microcode" would be more diplomatic (disgustingly so IMO). And one could argue that every package in non-free would deserve a "-legally-restricted" suffix.