3 ms·
Having a chickfila greatly increases realestate value for the landlord though, more so than other restaurant chains like McDonalds.
by Kagerjay 8y ago
Having a chickfila greatly increases realestate value for the landlord though, more so than other restaurant chains like McDonalds.
- abraham_lincoln 8y agoThat doesn't mean the local cable company will put in $100k of poles and coax to your restaurant. Also, McDonald's corporate owns all their real estate, franchisees, too.
- Kagerjay 8y agoIm not 100% sure its all of them (malls and airports come to mind) but yes its a vast majority. True I didn't consider the cable investment either. Normally the landlord pays for this but I imagine chickfila probably pays for part of the bill. That I dont know though
- walrus01 8y agoFor an ISP, if it requires a costly outside plant build to reach a premises for a business circuit, it will usually be rolled into some combination of an upfront connection fee (NRC) and monthly rate (MRC) to recoup the costs and have some positive ROI over a 3 to 5 year term. If it's something like a multi tenant office building they may gamble and take a calculated risk to lose money on the first customer over 5 years (example: $800 NRC and $500 MRC that comes nowhere near xoveinft the cost of the build), with a new expensive fiber build, and hope the sales team can sign up more tenants ASAP.
- reaperducer 8y agoMeh. That’s just conjecture. When a McDonald’s is located on a pad in a Target parking lot, the McDonald’s franchisee doesn’t own that land. It belongs to the owner of the strip mall. Ditto for the tens of thousands of McDonald’s restaurants located in office buildings, malls, airports, and inside other stores like Wal-marts. It’s not the 70’s anymore. The standalone McDonald’s is far from a majority of the outlets these days.