3 ms·
I'm surprised it's that different; in the optimum case, it feels like a several layers of JITing interpreter should get to the same performance in the end. Migh
by alexchamberlain 8y ago
I'm surprised it's that different; in the optimum case, it feels like a several layers of JITing interpreter should get to the same performance in the end. Might not be enough to trigger it I guess.
- chmod775 8y agoI can't see the code because I'm on mobile, but if the JIT is function based and you're only calling the benchmarked function once it may not have it optimized for your first call. It certainly can't replace the instructions mid-loop. Edit: SO answer explaining the PyPy JIT: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37377787/what-kind-of-jit-compiler-is-used-by-pypy https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37377787/what-kind-of-ji...