4 ms·
Evolution requires survival of the fittest. If the name got more enticing over time then it would be evolution.
by imd 16y ago
Evolution requires survival of the fittest. If the name got more enticing over time then it would be evolution.
- jforman 16y agoTechnically evolution does not require survival of the fittest or mutation. Evolution is merely the change in allelic frequency in a population over time. Without selective pressure (i.e., "survival of the fittest") you can still have evolution via drift, the founder effect, etc. Drift is a very important source of evolution in a lot of situations (during my PhD I studied how a source of seeming drift in the coding regions of genes was actually caused by selective pressure in some cases). Without mutation a population can still evolve, too - for example, if a disease struck and there was no mutation, an allele that protected against the disease would quickly dominate the population. This is a much more pedantic thing to point out (on my part), though, since every stretch of every organism's DNA mutates. The different mutation rates of viruses, bacteria, and humans due to replication errors (and the resulting effect on evolution) is a pretty fascinating topic, though.