3 ms·
The editor in a concrete form is one thing. Like what can the editor actually accomplish in terms of features. I'm not sure which of Emacs, Vim or Neovim would
by didibus 8y ago
The editor in a concrete form is one thing. Like what can the editor actually accomplish in terms of features. I'm not sure which of Emacs, Vim or Neovim would win this one.
It also depends if you assume out of the box feature set, or potential feature set. Like with added plugins and customization. I feel Emacs has the potential for many more features, and does have more in my experience, but not out of the box. Vim has a slight edge out of the box.
The other thing is the editing UX. The modal editing Vs key-chord editing. That's where I feel there is no all around winner. I find modal is great for small edits as I said. And single mode with key-chord I find better for long writing sessions, where you actually type a lot.
Are you saying you find modal to be best at both of these use cases?