> This argument is theological in that it's arguing against an idea With an actual license text publicly available, this is way beyond just an idea, wouldn't y

> This argument is theological in that it's arguing against an idea With an actual license text publicly available, this is way beyond just an idea, wouldn't you agree? > His ideal 'solution' is to just fold it all up and try to forget it ever happened This was not proposed as a solution to the problem(s) that Commons Clause wants to solve, problem(s) BTW that I can't see clearly articulated anywhere.