> More broadly, the average OSS license is far from robust. Like several people here, I'd really appreciate clarification on this. The average OSS license doe

> More broadly, the average OSS license is far from robust. Like several people here, I'd really appreciate clarification on this. The average OSS license doesn't apply to some use cases, but in every case I know that's intentional; they're uses that don't uphold the four freedoms. There are a handful of outstanding issues like Google's allergy to AGPL, but the GPL and MIT licenses are well-tested and accepted. I've regularly used them personally and professionally without any confusion or trouble at all. If there's a flaw or weakness in these licenses, people are obviously eager to hear about it. If they simply don't support restricting downstream rights, that's by design and I think "far from robust" is a thoroughly unfair way of framing the situation.