3 ms·
Yes, and right below it acknowledges that it is not Open Source and doesn't try to be: > It this “Open Source”? > No, at least not by the official definition s
by XiZhao 8y ago
Yes, and right below it acknowledges that it is not Open Source and doesn't try to be:
> It this “Open Source”?
> No, at least not by the official definition set forth by the OSD. Applying the Clause to an open source project will transition the project to “source-available”.
- nailer 8y agoYes. The page is full of tautologies. It shoudn't be. Here's a pull request: https://github.com/fossas/commons-clause/pull/3 https://github.com/fossas/commons-clause/pull/3
- justinjlynn 8y ago> Is this Open Source? No. The source is available for inspection and restricted use but, because of these restrictions, its licence is not Open Source per the Open Source Definition. That's all that needs to be said. Your page reads as though the author is hiding something or that the author is ashamed of the answer. Just come out and say it.