3 ms·
I am skeptical of the conclusion because of the imprecise language. For example, concluding ritual may be more effective than stringent dieting. 1. What is the
by Hnrobert42 8y ago
I am skeptical of the conclusion because of the imprecise language. For example, concluding ritual may be more effective than stringent dieting. 1. What is the documented efficacy of dieting over the same limited time period? 2. Are dieting and ritual mutually exclusive?
Is eating a carrot instead of chocolate necessarily a demonstration of will power? At least with the other studies, the subjects had a stated goal of weight loss.
How many subjects participated? Were the trials run more than once? The scholarly articles are paywalled, so all we are left with is this article. And this article seems more fitting for a grocery store checkout line rag than for Scientific American.
- robotresearcher 8y agoIt’s a popular article, not a formal report. It contains links as references to the papers. SciAm never publishes formal scientific articles as far as I know. It is a popular magazine about science, not a primary source journal.
- Hnrobert42 8y agoAs noted, the papers are paywalled. My criticism is actually less about the language that the quality of the study. However, without reading the actually papers, I cannot be sure it is the study that is flawed.