4 ms·
Don't we have the AGPL for this purpose to require them to contribute back their proprietary changes. As others have pointed out, if this was only about the mod
by TimothyBJacobs 8y ago
Don't we have the AGPL for this purpose to require them to contribute back their proprietary changes. As others have pointed out, if this was only about the modifications they would have used AGPL. Instead, and giving the clauses about consulting, it seems more like they are concerned about money than the health of the ecosystem.
- gregmac 8y agoThe Redis Labs modules were AGPL, they moved from that to Apache + Common Clause[1]. [1] https://twitter.com/antirez/status/1032192721308594176 https://twitter.com/antirez/status/1032192721308594176
- dragonwriter 8y ago> Don't we have the AGPL for this purpose to require them to contribute back their proprietary changes. That doesn't help upstream monetize; this is entirely about money, not reciprocal contributions of code.
- TimothyBJacobs 8y agoThat was the point I was trying to make. Guess I didn't word it well :)
- tree_of_item 8y agoMoney is a part of the health of the ecosystem.