3 ms·
It's clearly not open source. It meets no definition of open source that has ever existed. Even other things like the debian free software guidelines (which dat
by DannyBee 8y ago
It's clearly not open source.
It meets no definition of open source that has ever existed.
Even other things like the debian free software guidelines (which date back to 1997. Seee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_Free_Software_Guidelines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_Free_Software_Guideline...) would not consider this free
It's also clear the goal is to "seem" open source by reusing the license names of open source licenses.
- bradrydzewski 8y agoCan you point me to the line in the license file that clearly demonstrates Redis is not open source? https://github.com/antirez/redis/blob/unstable/COPYING https://github.com/antirez/redis/blob/unstable/COPYING
- detaro 8y agoAs noted even in the initial comment in thus subthread, Redis itself is not under this new license, and thus still Open Source.