4 ms·
Oh, get off your high horse. I'm not sure you read the article. The whole point of a "reasonable person" is that it represents an "average person". > this per
by vilmosi 8y ago
Oh, get off your high horse.
I'm not sure you read the article. The whole point of a "reasonable person" is that it represents an "average person".
> this person is seen to represent a composite of a relevant community's judgement as to how a typical member of said community should behave in situations that might pose a threat of harm (through action or inaction) to the public
This is why we have a jury of our peers picked at random. The randomness is not random.
- mehrdadn 8y ago> Oh, get off your high horse. I'm not sure you read the article. The whole point of a "reasonable person" is that it represents an "average person". Er, pardon? This isn't my high horse. This is literally your own article's text, which you yourself apparently didn't read: > As a legal fiction, the "reasonable person" is not an average person or a typical person, leading to great difficulties in applying the concept in some criminal cases, especially in regards to the partial defence of provocation.
- stale2002 8y agoThe definition of "reasonable person", in the LEGAL sense is average person. I am not sure why you purposefully misinterpreted the legal definition of the words "reasonable person", according to the courts.
- tomhoward 8y agoHN guidelines: Please don't use uppercase for emphasis. If you want to emphasize a word or phrase, put asterisks* around it and it will get italicized.* I also use _underscores_ sometimes. Does just as good a job at emphasising, but without seeming so shouty.
- dang 8y ago> Oh, get off your high horse. That sort of personal swipe will get you banned here. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and not do this kind of thing on HN, we'd appreciate it.