You say "that's not what happened" then propose what did happen... Is there proof of these things or is it how you are choosing to interpret some of info? Sure

You say "that's not what happened" then propose what did happen... Is there proof of these things or is it how you are choosing to interpret some of info? Surely att, sprint and others know that their lines are used for kidnapping, drugging and advertising sex, I don't think that makes them or backpage part of those ills. You propose they chose to cooperate with traffickers and make it sound like it was an A or B choice. I propose it is possible to cooperate with hookers and law enforcement at the same time, and from what I have seen, maybe that is what happened, not at all what you are implying. Do you claim to know how much Backpage was "truly cooperating with LE" ? As someone who has reported internet postings to LE and spent hundreds of hours trying to push similar info to various agencies, let me assure you that what many might imagine could happen when a site reports bad postings to whatever agencies, not many of them get a warrant and swat team to swoop in the next day. In fact they often don't do shit about it. I this comment you post quotes about "Backpage has automatically deleted from ads before publication include... ... “amber alert,”" and in another comment on this page you state "Backpage were telling advertisers to use phrases like "amber alert"." You seem to be very confused on these particular issues.