2 ms·
I was; my comment was about the purported lack of repercussions for disobediance. Also, you were responding to: > a teenager mowing the lawn for their parents
by a1369209993 8y ago
I was; my comment was about the purported lack of repercussions for disobediance.
Also, you were responding to:
> a teenager mowing the lawn for their parents
which was about their (owner's) own lawn.
- rosser 8y agoThe full quote I was responding to is: >>>> What's the difference between a teenager mowing the lawn for their parents and someone paid to mow a lawn? In response to which, I said: >>> The kid getting paid to mow neighborhood lawns has: Selective quoting tends to change the context a bit, don't you think?