4 ms·
You couldn't be more wrong. The supreme court could reinterpret this, and require forced labor to be a part of the sentence, not just allowed to be used agains
by RIMR 8y ago
You couldn't be more wrong.
The supreme court could reinterpret this, and require forced labor to be a part of the sentence, not just allowed to be used against anyone in prison.
Precedent changes over time. This idea that the current interpretation of the Constitution is immutable is defeatist and foolish.
- goobynight 8y agoThe supreme court could reinterpret anything. The trend at the moment is that they aren't interfering with past rulings and that's not about to change with the new addition.
- DenisM 8y agoRemember the recent gay marriage ruling? They re-interpreted centuries of tradition.