> Terrible book. While LYAH may not be ideal, isn't calling it "terrible" a tad too harsh? FWIW I learned Haskell using LYAH and enjoyed it thoroughly. It was

> Terrible book. While LYAH may not be ideal, isn't calling it "terrible" a tad too harsh? FWIW I learned Haskell using LYAH and enjoyed it thoroughly. It was my first time learning a language with such a high focus on functional programming, but I think this book did a good job of teaching it.