3 ms·
Very interesting! I've been debating if we want to continue using Sphinx (http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/basics.html http://www.sphi
by truebosko 8y ago
Very interesting! I've been debating if we want to continue using Sphinx (http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/basics.html http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/b...) for our documentation website, and focus on a tool that provides a more robust platform for publishing a content focused site.
Sphinx is great for building out an API reference, but there's so much more to a documentation website beyond that.
Anyone have insight into this idea?
- therealmarv 8y agoGhost is not the best bet for documentations. It's great in its area but not for sphinx like documentation. Better look at mkdocs! If you want to see a website we created from a Sphinx to mkdocs switch: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17717513 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17717513