> And almost all of those non-Keynesians [perhaps a better term would be anti-Keynesians] are wrong. Hmm, you seem to be claiming a either conclusive proof tha

> And almost all of those non-Keynesians [perhaps a better term would be anti-Keynesians] are wrong. Hmm, you seem to be claiming a either conclusive proof that Keynesianism is correct or disproof of Monetarism, new classical macroeconomics, and the Austrian school, etc. Either of these would be news to me. Am I reading you wrong?