4 ms·
"I know it is true because an American paper says Russian did X and Y". I'm not saying it isn't, but WSJ and FT as sources? Really?
by TheForumTroll 8y ago
"I know it is true because an American paper says Russian did X and Y".
I'm not saying it isn't, but WSJ and FT as sources? Really?
- pc86 8y agoI'm not sure what you want as sources if two well respected, global news publications don't make the cut.
- fourpacalypse 8y agoThose are legit, fairly reliable news sources.
- krn 8y agoIf you want to understand how Russia works, there are plenty of international sources. "How Russia won the World Cup" by the The Guardian[1] is a one of them. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jun/14/how-russia-won-the-world-cup https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jun/14/how-russia-won-...
- neonate 8y agoThe Guardian is not a reliable source on this topic. For example, the ludicrous Luke Harding.
- krn 8y agoThe Guardian has published more facts about Russia's interference in Brexit and the US presidential election than probably any other newspaper in the world, and has been owned by a non-profit organization since 1936[1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Trust_Limited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Trust_Limited
- dragonwriter 8y agoFT is not by any standard an American paper, unless the US annexed either the UK (where it is HQed) or Japan (where it's corporate parent is based) when I wasn't paying attention.