3 ms·
It's strange not to mention vanilla RDS (only Aurora is mentioned). Is RDS much more expensive?
by hayd 8y ago
It's strange not to mention vanilla RDS (only Aurora is mentioned). Is RDS much more expensive?
- some_account 8y agoI was looking into it a bit before. The smallest RDS instance was like 11 dollars per month and can't use spot instances (naturally). If you do use spot instance with a local postgres on EBS, it comes down to about 4 dollars per month all together. With instance store, that should be around 3 dollars. These are for t2 micro. If you use bigger instances, the money difference will be huge. RDS is just way too expensive for small projects.
- dpeck 8y ago$11/month is too expensive for a small project?
- some_account 8y agoIt's my private project of trying to build an interesting browser plug-in using aws services. I want to keep the costs super low since I need it running all the time but will only use a handful of computers running my plugins while developing. I do it partly to learn about aws features, partly because I would like if this plug-in existed myself and it doesn't :)
- cntlzw 8y agoYes, Aurora is not cheap if you run bigger instances with slaves. But I can't compare it with costs running bare metal in datacenter.