2 ms·
But it’s his employees that he’s making work more hours, so that doesn’t make any sense
by gaius 8y ago
But it’s his employees that he’s making work more hours, so that doesn’t make any sense
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- aetherson 8y agoSo, what, your initial comment had truthiness even though it made a complaint based on not reading or misreading the article?
- danso 8y agoWe aren’t required to automatically accept someone’s claim as the truth when the evidence suggests otherwise. The CEO removed the 4-day week for everyone.
- aetherson 8y agoFor sure, but the starter of this thread suggested he called his employees lazy. He didn't. He said it killed his work ethic, and that he now worked a 65 hour week. It might be that for his median employee, it increased hourly productivity -- but by less than 12%. Or that it didn't affect hourly productivity. Or, as a peer suggested, that it just felt shitty to lay some people off while others worked less than a conventional "full" work week for full salary.
- dragonwriter 8y agoIt makes perfect sense if the reason it depressed his work ethic was that he was demotivated by the fact that everyone else wasn't slaving away 5+ days a week.