4 ms·
He said it made for a lack of work ethic in himself.
by aetherson 8y ago
He said it made for a lack of work ethic in himself.
- gaius 8y agoBut it’s his employees that he’s making work more hours, so that doesn’t make any sense
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- aetherson 8y agoSo, what, your initial comment had truthiness even though it made a complaint based on not reading or misreading the article?
- danso 8y agoWe aren’t required to automatically accept someone’s claim as the truth when the evidence suggests otherwise. The CEO removed the 4-day week for everyone.
- aetherson 8y agoFor sure, but the starter of this thread suggested he called his employees lazy. He didn't. He said it killed his work ethic, and that he now worked a 65 hour week. It might be that for his median employee, it increased hourly productivity -- but by less than 12%. Or that it didn't affect hourly productivity. Or, as a peer suggested, that it just felt shitty to lay some people off while others worked less than a conventional "full" work week for full salary.
- dragonwriter 8y agoIt makes perfect sense if the reason it depressed his work ethic was that he was demotivated by the fact that everyone else wasn't slaving away 5+ days a week.