3 ms·
Really, really false. He explains in detail why it's better, and then advises people to still not take it.
by mundo 8y ago
Really, really false. He explains in detail why it's better, and then advises people to still not take it.
- jl2718 8y agoDetails: it comes in a packet instead of a pill, he likes the team, it has 7 ingredients instead of 20. I can't find one science-based reason to take this particular brand that he links to and keeps on praising throughout the article. This level of shilling requires a disclosure statement.
- mundo 8y agoThis is still false. He does not praise it (beyond "it's better than the really bad one I just described"), and he explicitly advises against taking it. I can only suggest reading the article more carefully because you've missed the entire point of it, which is to avoid all such combo-pills and experiment with nootropics (if at all) one at a time.